AMD can't really do business with Havok anymore because rival company Intel scooped up the physics developer back in September.
But that doesn't mean AMD is out of the acquisition game; in fact, AMD has been considering purchasing AGEIA, a rival physics developer, for several months now.
Richard Huddy, head of developer relations for AMD, told Custom PC, "We've had that discussion, yes. It's a discussion that goes round every three months - someone turns to me and says 'why don't we buy Ageia?' and I go through the arguments about why we should and why we shouldn't."
It's kind of interesting though, AMD considered purchasing Havok, but the price was too high. My guess is that AMD is still reeling from the $5.4 billion purchase of ATI back in July.
Huddy said, "Our biggest problem is that Havok reputedly cost in excess of $100 million. If I'd been valuing Havok, I'd have valued it at probably something like 10 percent of that because they were in so much trouble in the marketplace."
Now that Havok is out of the independent picture, AGEIA's market value certainly increased and I'm sure many companies are eager to scoop them up. Huddy commented, "I bet the same thing has gone through the minds of Nvidia and the other companies that play in this marketplace."
Even though AGEIA's PhysX chip hasn't been widely embraced, its free PhysX software has; for example, Epic Games' Unreal Engine 3 supports the PhysX technology. Also free games have been released that support and advertise the PhysX technology, such as NetDevil's Warmonger. In the future, I wouldn't rule out someone purchasing AGEIA.
Kyle Stallock
Updated June 4th, 2008
Indie Games Journalism
Brendon Lindsey
Updated October 19, 2008
Blu-Ray Review: Bond...
Frank Ling
Updated: Aug. 1th, 2008 Are you a game snob?
Eddie Inzauto
Updated Wed, October 28
Silent Hill scribblings
GamerNode needs your help. Register
now and join thousands of gamers in a
crusade to spread the word of
GamerNode!
Join the Node Army!
It'd be interesting if AMD or NVIDIA bought AGEIA. Might see the PhysX hardware built directly into the next gen of CPUs and/or video cards.
well if ati continue whit superior technology (just not superiout clock frequency) on there grphics cards we'll soon see build in physics processor as an old ati card can act as one if you would want to
leonick, if ati is so superior why are the bench marks from recent cards so lack lustre?
there most recent card is as good as nvidias newest.... ok sure its 20 fps behind but wtf you cant see any difference between 40 and 75 fps, or barly none.... and just a thing which you can notice in comparisonpictures is that ati crads renders the graphics better, which means it looks better and the fps may drop a little unnoticable
Yeah but in a firefight, the ati card will drop to 25 fps whereas the nvidea one will drop to something like 60. Tell me, which one do you want now, the one with more or less?
bs.... a good configured ati dosnt drop more than 2-5 fps in a firefight
2-5 less than original then... and well 25 not to bad your eyes wont see much difference
25 Fps is quite low if you haven't noticed. 60 Fps is considered smooth. It might not make much difference on an RTS or whatever but on a First person shooter it makes a big difference.
There is actually an easily noticeable difference between 40 and 75 frames =/