Crave Online » Gaming » GamerNode

Gamernode: News - AMD considering buying AGEIA?

Search
News

AMD considering buying AGEIA?

Category: PC, Posted: 11/22/2007 at 08:37PM CST by Billy Wang, Previews Editor

amdlogoAMD can't really do business with Havok anymore because rival company Intel scooped up the physics developer back in September.

But that doesn't mean AMD is out of the acquisition game; in fact, AMD has been considering purchasing AGEIA, a rival physics developer, for several months now.

Richard Huddy, head of developer relations for AMD, told Custom PC, "We've had that discussion, yes. It's a discussion that goes round every three months - someone turns to me and says 'why don't we buy Ageia?' and I go through the arguments about why we should and why we shouldn't."

It's kind of interesting though, AMD considered purchasing Havok, but the price was too high. My guess is that AMD is still reeling from the $5.4 billion purchase of ATI back in July.

Huddy said, "Our biggest problem is that Havok reputedly cost in excess of $100 million. If I'd been valuing Havok, I'd have valued it at probably something like 10 percent of that because they were in so much trouble in the marketplace."

Now that Havok is out of the independent picture, AGEIA's market value certainly increased and I'm sure many companies are eager to scoop them up. Huddy commented, "I bet the same thing has gone through the minds of Nvidia and the other companies that play in this marketplace."

Even though AGEIA's PhysX chip hasn't been widely embraced, its free PhysX software has; for example, Epic Games' Unreal Engine 3 supports the PhysX technology. Also free games have been released that support and advertise the PhysX technology, such as NetDevil's Warmonger. In the future, I wouldn't rule out someone purchasing AGEIA.

Posted by jambo on 11/22/2007 at 10:32PM

It'd be interesting if AMD or NVIDIA bought AGEIA. Might see the PhysX hardware built directly into the next gen of CPUs and/or video cards.

Posted by Leonick on 11/22/2007 at 10:38PM

well if ati continue whit superior technology (just not superiout clock frequency) on there grphics cards we'll soon see build in physics processor as an old ati card can act as one if you would want to

Posted by Flarty on 11/23/2007 at 07:33AM

leonick, if ati is so superior why are the bench marks from recent cards so lack lustre?

Posted by Leonick on 11/23/2007 at 07:35AM

there most recent card is as good as nvidias newest.... ok sure its 20 fps behind but wtf you cant see any difference between 40 and 75 fps, or barly none.... and just a thing which you can notice in comparisonpictures is that ati crads renders the graphics better, which means it looks better and the fps may drop a little unnoticable

Posted by Dr.Aaron on 11/23/2007 at 09:50AM

Yeah but in a firefight, the ati card will drop to 25 fps whereas the nvidea one will drop to something like 60. Tell me, which one do you want now, the one with more or less?

Posted by Leonick on 11/23/2007 at 01:36PM

bs.... a good configured ati dosnt drop more than 2-5 fps in a firefight

Posted by Leonick on 11/23/2007 at 01:37PM

2-5 less than original then... and well 25 not to bad your eyes wont see much difference

Posted by Lopez on 11/23/2007 at 05:57PM

25 Fps is quite low if you haven't noticed. 60 Fps is considered smooth. It might not make much difference on an RTS or whatever but on a First person shooter it makes a big difference.

Posted by jambo on 11/23/2007 at 07:22PM

There is actually an easily noticeable difference between 40 and 75 frames =/

Post a Comment

Please login or sign up as a GamerNode member to post a comment.