Gamernode: Reviews - Marvel Trading Card Game

Search
Review

Marvel Trading Card Game

Category: Sony PSP, Posted: 03/15/2007 at 10:13PM CDT by Frank Ling, Editorial Director
  • Marvel Trading Card Game
  • Sony PSP
  • Konami
  • Konami
  • February 27th, 2007

There have been a lot of collectible card games (CCG) in the past 14 years and the ones most people are familiar with are franchises such as Pokemon, Magic: The Gathering and Yu-Gi-Oh!. These and other TCGs all have similar mechanics in how they are played, but are also different from each other in regards to things such as their relative levels of complexity and gameplay features. A relative new comer to the block of trading card games is the VS. System which first appeared in 2004 and was published by the trading card giant Upper Deck Entertainment. The card game, which is based upon comic book characters, was received well, and now three years later, the video game version of the card game is on the scene: The Marvel Trading Card Game.

TMTCG follows its real life alter ego closely and plays in the same way that the live version does, but this immediately sets the game up for failure because unless you are a fan of CCGs, the game will either make no sense to you or have you wondering why this game was even developed as a video game. These words may be harsh, but the reality of the matter is that CCGs are an acquired taste, and unless you are a big fan of these types of games, there is little need to even pick this title up. Since the audience is limited, the game won't appeal to the vast majority of gamers.

It's too bad that this game is so heavily specialized because it does have some good features going for it. Instead of you carrying around tons of cards in your card box, you have the convenience of having them all nicely tucked away in electronic form. If you're by yourself, you can have a good enough time battling it out with your computer opponents or online with your fellow gamers.

Gameplay revolves around the concept of breaking down your opponent until all of his endurance points are lost. Think of these as hit points in an RPG. Once the points are all gone, the team is defeated. In TMTCG the card sets are built from characters in the Marvel Origins decks and Marvel expansion packs. Single player offers a storyline mode where you begin your journey through the Marvel universe and still art cut scenes are introduced to reveal the plot of the game.

This title involves four steps for each turn -- draw phase, build phase, combat phase, and recovery phase. During draw, each player is given two cards from the deck. In the build phase, you can recruit characters, put cards in the resource row, and place your cards in formation to get ready for battle. Combat is where the action is. Players face off against each other with their respective characters and try to stun or damage the enemy. A character is stunned when either his attack rating or defensive rating is less than the other player's attacking card. Any damage which goes beyond the stats of the attacked player is considered "breakthrough damage" and decreases the overall endurance rating of the opposing player. Both players start with 50 endurance points, and as breakthrough damage accumulates against each team, the total diminishes until one player goes to zero or below zero in endurance points and is declared the loser. The last phase, recovery, allows one stunned character to be recovered.

There are other factors which can change the course of gameplay, such as using plot twist cards, location cards or equipment cards. These cards alter the character or the state of the game and can give advantages over the enemy. But the enemy doesn't necessarily mean you are automatically the good guy. In TMTCG, you also have the option to play the villain, so Dr. Doom fans should be happy to hear that. Other features in the game also allow you to do team attacks where the stats of two characters from the same team can be combined in an attack. Reinforcement is a defensive move where other characters can come to the aid of an attacked member.

Playing this game reminded me of playing chess -- you can pick up the basic skills in about an hour or so, but to be really good at it, you have to understand all the little details of strategy that goes along with a successful game. Personally, I'm terrible at chess because the pace is just too slow or I don't possess the patience or interest in the game. And so it goes for TMTCG, as well. The action unfolds slowly as you set up your card formations, plan your moves and attack and defend, but the whole process seems to end up in a "so what?" sort of feeling. There's a certain element of satisfaction in playing a well-planned move, but the game seems mechanical and uninspired. The multiplayer mode gives you the opportunity to play against real human opponents online, but for some diehard fans of the game, it will be a poor substitution for live play.

Graphics, as you well may imagine, are limited because, well, it's a card game. There is a playing field where your cards and those of the other team are placed. Limited animations occur when cards are attacked, played or stunned. The status of a card can be seen by the way it looks. If your card character is stunned, it will be flipped over. If it is exhausted, it will be flipped on its side horizontally. If your character is healthy and ready for battle, it is upright and facing you. The card art is ok, but apart from the physical representation of what they look like, that is about the extent of what goes on graphically with this game. Yawn.

Sound for the game is passing, with some good comic book music and the occasional sound effects while your cards are in battle. Otherwise, the game is pretty bare when it comes to the audio portion.

Overall, the whole experience was disappointing. Although The Marvel Trading Card Game draws its inspiration from the popular VS. System from Upper Deck, the video game version fails to hold the interest of the general gamer. For fans of this CCG, they may find that playing the online version may be all that is of interest, if any, to them. The lack of animations, sparse audio, and rather slow and complicated gameplay makes this a title that is only for the extreme fan and leaves out almost everyone else.

Game Score
GamePlay: Overall, its a boring and confusing experience unless you are the most fanatic of fans for games like this. And even if you are a fan, why play this video game when you can have more fun playing against real opponents with real cards? Duh.
Graphics: Yes, there are some. That's about as much as you can say about this game. The cards are nice looking, but with almost a total absence of animations or special effects, the game barely passes on this level.
Sound: Yes, there is some sound too. There are raging comic book tunes here, but other than that, you won't find much in this area of the game.
Replay Value: If you like CCGs, there should be a great deal for you to do as you can always upgrade and expand your decks. The gameplay is virtually unlimited, but that depends if you really want to play this game in the first place.
4.5 Final Word: This game is narrowly focused at collectible card game fans. Even hardcore followers will see that playing this version falls way short of play against real people with real cards. As for the rest of the gamers, the game probably won't be fun at all.
Click for ratings guide
Meta Critic GameRankings
Posted by Soundude on 03/20/2007 at 09:11AM

I find this review to be rather flawed. First you say that the game closely follows the CCG it is modeled after. Then you proceed to imply that this is some sort of flaw. You go on to say that it is rather advantageous to have an electronic version as opposed to carrying around lots of cards and that it provides the opportunity to play in one player mode if your friends are not available. Then you say that it falls short of playing with real cards. Which is it? To call the game mechanical and uninspired is unfair if it is actually accurately portraying the original game design.
It seems to me that this review is overly weighted by the fact that you don't like CCGs instead of being judged by it's merits. If I don't like CCGs, I don't need someone who writes reviews to give a CCG based game a bad review in order to know I won't like this game. I already know that. I'm not going to get the game, I'm not even going to read the review.
If I were to review a game like Half-Life, Unreal, or any other first person shooter using your criteria, I would have to give them a score of 2.0. FPS make me sick to the point of throwing up. If I reviewed one of these games on it's merits, I'd say this game has lots of replayability, graphics that add to the experience (or are stellar or made me by a new Graphics card), well thought out storyline, a variety in it's soundtrack, good voice acting, nice sound effects and probably go with 8.0 overall.
If you're going to review the game, then judge the game on it's content. If you're going to provide an editorial on why games like Chess, Go, Othello, and all CCGs are so hideously boring and should be avoided by all gamers, then you should write editorials, not reviews.

Posted by Quasar on 03/20/2007 at 10:08PM

Thanks for your comments soundude. I guess we are on different wave lengths on the review of this game. Basically, when we review a game, it is done with the purpose of making sure that our gaming fans get a fair review that will tip them off to why or why not a game is fun. If a game is good, we say so. If it is bad, we do that too.

CCG fans are some of the best gamers around because these games aren't always the easiest to learn. However, a port of a fun card game doesn't necessarily translate into a fun video game, and this is what happened with the Marvel Trading Card game. It has some good points, as I mentioned, and telling fans the good and bad points of a game isn't contradictory--it's just a matter of showing the strengths and weaknesses.

Have you ever played real golf and any video game counterparts? Some golfers will say that the translation of a golf game to the virtual world is excellent, but in saying so, this doesn't necessarily mean the video game will be fun. There are some things that cannot be simulated--the experience of being on the golf course, playing with your friends, the friendship and competition, and other factors are hard to duplicate. In CCGs, this is also true. When you play against an opponent, there is the excitement of live competition, the trash talk, trying to read your opponent, and executing a well planned attack or defensive move. But again, this doesn't mean that a CCG will translate into a fun video game.

If you feel that a game deserves an 8.0, that's great because it gives gamers another point of view. I am not infallible, (just ask my wife), but all I can do is do the best that I can with these reviews and put myself into the general gamer's shoes by asking, "Will they enjoy this title?" In the case of the Marvel Trading Card Game, it seems to fall short in the entertainment factor for the CCG fan or the general gamer.

But in any event, any game, no matter what shape, type or form, can be a winner in anyone's eyes. And this being the case, there will always be a little, and sometimes a lot, of disagreement concerning the worthiness of a video game. But in the long run, we're all still gamers and we can always bounce our opinions and gripes on each other. I guess we can all sing campfire songs now...lol.

Our reviews are only one of many out there and the best way for our reading audience to get the total picture is to read other reviews from different places. We'd like to think that we're one of the good guys out there, trying to clear the dust and give honest reviews, but for those who don't think so, the internet is an open range and anyone can feast on the huge amount of info that is out there.

Anyway, thanks again for your comments.

-frank

Post a Comment

Please login or sign up as a GamerNode member to post a comment.